Home Contact Us Site Map
Search for:
About Us Services News Calendar
Health Info Find a Job Find a Physician
Hospitals
Children’s Hospital
Clinic
Health Plans
Foundation
Ways to Give
Areas of Excellence
Web Nursery
For Patients and Visitors
E-mail a Patient
Patient Pre-registration
For Physicians,
Co-workers and Volunteers
Libraries
Vendor Resources
Privacy Practices and Web Use Information
 
Home > Health Information > E-Newsletters > Mind & Body 

Experts Call Anti-Aging Products a Waste of Money

Not only do they not work, but also some are harmful to your health

Anti-aging products that promise to turn back the clock do not deliver and may even be hazardous to your health, says a renowned team of scientists.

"Don't waste your money on anti-aging products," says S. Jay Olshansky, a professor in the School of Public Health at the University of Illinois at Chicago and a senior research scientist at the university's Center on Aging.

Olshansky and 50 of his colleagues, all top researchers in the field of human aging, recently drafted a position statement on the subject. In it, they warn consumers that anti-aging products (such as growth hormone and antioxidant supplements) and promises of longer and longer life spans via such measures as caloric restriction are not proven to work for humans. Olshansky also co-wrote an essay on the topic that accompanies the position paper in the June issue of Scientific American.

Not unexpectedly, the paper drew fire from one of the leading proponents of anti-aging medicine, who calls it a "100 percent political" attempt by traditional physicians to wrest control of a growing industry.

In the paper and the essay, the scientists tackle a wide range of products, but in an interview Olshansky singled out human growth hormone, melatonin, and dehydroepiandrosterone (better known as DHEA) as specific products to avoid. Some anti-aging proponents contend that replacing these hormones as their levels dwindle with age can keep people young.

Some Anti-Aging Products May Prove to Be Harmful

Not only do these products not deliver what they tout, Olshansky says, but "some of these products are likely to be dangerous. In animal models, animals given growth hormone have shorter life spans. Short-term, the animals appear younger, but they die sooner."

Likewise, he adds, nutritional supplements rich in antioxidant vitamins E and C that purport to soak up free radicals, those renegade molecules that damage cells and tissues, are not proven. The vast majority of studies showing that antioxidant intake is valuable for reducing the risk of cancer and other ailments have been done with foods, not vitamins, Olshansky says.

In the essay, he and his two co-authors further state that "no one has established that vitamin supplements containing antioxidants limit oxidative damage in the body or influence aging."

While the public is bombarded with misleading anti-aging claims, Olshansky and his colleagues say, serious biologists are studying the underlying nature of aging to determine how to slow it down, improve the quality of life, and ward off disease.

"No product currently sold [for that purpose] has been demonstrated to reverse aging," Olshansky says.
Some areas under study, including caloric restriction and genetic manipulation, are viewed by the authors as worthy of more research.

The essay and the position paper have clearly outraged one of the more outspoken advocates of anti-aging medicine.

Dr. Ronald Klatz is president of the American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine in Chicago, and he posts studies on his Web site finding favorable effects for growth hormone and the use of megavitamins to fight disease.

"How can you be against anti-aging medicine?" asks Klatz, who says he plans to submit a rebuttal to Scientific American. The decision to publish the position paper, he says, "is 100 percent political. It's all about who will control a trillion-dollar industry."

He defines anti-aging medicine as "any intervention or modality that has to do with the early detection, prevention, treatment, or reversal of age-related diseases. We don't promise to reverse aging."

While critics focus on anti-aging products, Klatz says anti-aging medicine is much more than that. It is committed to health promotion and advocates nutrition monitoring, managing risk factors for disease, and disease screenings. According to Klatz, more than 10,000 physicians and scientists worldwide belong to his academy, and anti-aging medicine has matured into a prestigious medical field.

The only common ground Olshansky and Klatz seem to share is promotion of a healthy lifestyle that includes regular exercise and a sound diet.

Looking for the Fountain of Youth

"If there is a Fountain of Youth—and by the way, there isn't—the closest you can come is exercise and, of course, a good diet," Olshansky says. "Exercise has been shown to reduce blood pressure, increase muscle mass, reduce body fat, improve mental acuity, and improve skin elasticity."
If you are wondering how to spend the money you now spend on anti-aging products, Olshansky has a few suggestions. "Arrange a meeting with a registered dietitian. Buy a good pair of walking shoes. And get a massage."

Always consult your physician for more information.

 

June 2002

Some Anti-Aging Products May Prove to Be Harmful

Looking for the Fountain of Youth

Exercise Keeps the Elderly Strong and Independent

Online Resources



Exercise Keeps the Elderly Strong and Independent

It is no surprise that whatever your age, exercise is good for you.

But a new study's results should be encouraging news to older folks: Exercising just once a week may be enough to allow you to stay on your own and remain independent.

According to researchers from Ball State University in Muncie, Ind., older adults need to exercise only one day a week to maintain their muscle strength, allowing them to avoid injuries and remain independent.

Low-volume, high-intensity resistance training can counter the decline in muscle strength and size commonly associated with aging that can lead to falls, say the researchers.

In this study, 10 men all over age 70 did resistance training three days a week for three months. They were then divided into two groups of five men: one that continued the exercise, one that stopped.

Six months later, the five who stopped regular physical activity had a significant decline in muscle size and strength. But those who continued resistance training once a week maintained the strength they had developed in the initial training session.

The study was published in a recent issue of the Journal of Gerontology: Biological Sciences.

Always consult your physician for more information.



Online Resources

American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine

Journal of Gerontology: Biological Sciences

Scientific American

 

A member of the
Sisters of Mercy Health System